- The R Roundup
- Posts
- Was Pump.fun Really Getting Dangerous?
Was Pump.fun Really Getting Dangerous?
What started as a haven for memecoin enthusiasts has quickly spiraled into a breeding ground for increasingly extreme and troubling behavior.

If there’s one platform that has captured the attention of the crypto community, it ought to be Pump.fun. A rising star in the memecoin space, Pump.fun has broken records for user engagement and revenue in quite a short time.
Yet, its rapid ascent reveals a dark side. What started as a haven for memecoin enthusiasts has quickly spiraled into a breeding ground for increasingly extreme and troubling behavior.
The platform has transformed memecoin hype into a chaotic spectacle, blurring the lines between online antics and real-world consequences.
Is this the price of decentralized innovation, or can platforms like Pump.fun strike a balance between creativity and accountability?
TL; DR 🚨
Pump.fun’s livestream feature led to extreme and dangerous antics by memecoin developers, prompting its removal.
The platform’s gamified structure incentivized reckless behavior, highlighting the dark side of decentralized hype.
Major exchanges like Binance fuel memecoin mania by legitimizing these tokens, despite ethical concerns.
The Pump.fun saga underscores the need for stronger oversight and accountability in web3 spaces.
From Barks to Bullets: A Tale of Memecoin Culture Gone Too Far 🐾
Memecoins have always been chaotic for as long as we can recall. However, recent events on Pump.fun have pushed the chaos to troubling extremes. The platform’s livestream antics turned absurd promises into disturbing actions, showing how quickly online hype can spill into the real world.
In one instance, a memecoin developer locked themselves in a cage, barking like a dog until their coin attracted enough buyers. Another went as far as threatening to harm animals. One killed a chicken, and others allegedly threatened even worse acts if their coins didn’t see sufficient purchases.
Shockingly, one dev fired a gun out their window whenever their coin hit certain milestones!
PumpFun: From Memecoin Gambling to a "Dark Web" Platform.🧵
Solana’s top memecoin launchpad takes a shocking turn, descending into controversy.
PumpFun, once known for promoting blockchain on Solana, is now criticized for disturbing livestreams.
— The Crypto Times (@CryptoTimes_io)
10:34 AM • Nov 28, 2024
The absurdity of these actions shows how far people were willing to go for attention and financial gain. Pump.fun’s team was compelled to disable the live stream feature after heated community pressure.
While the decision to shut down its live-streaming function has likely reduced these behaviors, the disturbing events highlight a deeper problem: the unchecked mania that platforms like Pump.fun can amplify.
This isn’t the first time digital communities have crossed the line between virtual and physical spaces, but the speed and scale at which it occurred on Pump.fun is alarming. The gamified structure of the platform incentivizes visibility at all costs, pushing some users to engage in reckless and unethical behavior.
Memecoins As More Than Memes 💥
It’s tempting to dismiss memecoins as harmless internet culture — amusing, fleeting, and inconsequential. Yet, the events on Pump.fun reveal a darker truth. Memecoins aren’t just memes. Instead, they are more like hyperstitions, or rather, fictions that shape reality.
Memecoins are no longer just funny digital tokens. They’ve become symbols of community, speculation, and sometimes, desperation. Investors go all in, hoping their coin will "go to the moon."
But here’s the twist. It’s not just about making exponential returns within unrealistic timelines; memecoins have become emotional investments.
People tie their identities, hopes, and even mental health to these tokens. That’s why we see cases where users threaten to harm themselves if their coin doesn’t hit a certain value.
Memecoins have power, and with power comes responsibility. It’s time we stop treating memecoins as harmless fun and start recognizing their potential to do real harm.
We need to ask: are we enabling a new form of digital gambling, where human dignity and lives, not just money, are at stake?
Whatever the answer to this question is, someone has to take responsibility to bring back sanity to markets.
Platforms vs. People: Who's Really to Blame? ⚖️
Before we cast blame on any particular party, there’s something we must admit. Since their inception, social platforms have struggled to eliminate harmful, exploitative, and manipulative content.
Take Facebook for example.
Facebook has long struggled with issues ranging from hate speech to pornographic content and the promotion of violence. Whistleblower Frances Haugen revealed that Facebook’s algorithms prioritize engagement over safety, often amplifying harmful content because it drives user interaction, even when it endangers public safety.
The challenge trickles down to web3 social platforms. Pump.fun didn’t create these behaviors, but its mechanics enabled them. The platform rewards the most attention-grabbing projects, often prioritizing spectacle over substance.
Without safeguards, the system breeds an environment where extreme acts are not only tolerated but incentivized. To prevent such incidents from recurring, Pump.fun and similar platforms must rethink their features.
Removing the live streaming function was a necessary first step, but more can be done, including:
Vetting mechanisms for coins
Stricter community guidelines
Moderation tools to help curb harmful content and behavior ((possibly through AI)
Next steps for pump fun are simple:
1. Pause front end
2. Remove livestream
3. Resume front end
4. Hire multiple 3rd party human + AI content moderation teams
5. Resume livestreamLong term - switch to solana based decentralized live streaming but continue content moderation.
— StrategicHash (@StrategicHash)
5:04 PM • Nov 25, 2024
At the same time, the crypto community must take responsibility. Platforms like Pump.fun thrive on collective participation. Users need to demand accountability, call out, and shy away from harmful or exploitative behavior instead of encouraging it. Memecoins can remain fun and engaging without sacrificing ethical standards.
Ultimately, it’s both a platform problem and a community challenge. Platforms must implement stronger controls, while communities need to promote ethical behavior. Without action on both fronts, the risks of decentralized spaces could outweigh the rewards.
Profiting From the Pump: Are Crypto Exchanges Fueling the Fire? 🔥
The problem with memecoins extends deep beyond the desperate degen investors gambling for some quick profits. In the past, reputable exchanges like Binance and OKX have listed memecoins on their platforms.
Just recently, Binance listed ACT I: The AI Prophecy (ACT), causing the token to spike over 2600% in just 15 mins. With it came stories of newly minted millionaires.
Making $4.77M on $ACT in just 18 days!
From Oct 25 to Nov 3, the trader spent 2,658 $SOL($457K) to buy 17.16M $ACT.
After #Binance announced the listing of $ACT, he sold 9.33M $ACT for 11,945 $SOL($2.48M) to take profits.
Leaving 7.83M $ACT($2.74M), with a total profit of… x.com/i/web/status/1…
— Lookonchain (@lookonchain)
9:33 AM • Nov 11, 2024
Such listings and success stories legitimize memecoins as viable financial instruments. When memecoins make it to an exchange like Binance, which boasts over 240 million users around the world, they gain mainstream appeal.
In turn, normies and other degen traders double down on the markets, hoping to catch the next big thing. Competition stiffens. Memecoin devs get desperate to capture attention and pump their coins, resorting to questionable antics.
And just like that, the vicious cycle continues!
However, it raises important questions about the ethical responsibilities of exchanges in enabling toxic memecoin culture. Wouldn't they rather focus on utility projects that have real-world impact?
Binance’s former CEO Chang Peng Zhao has recently expressed concern about memecoins spiraling out of control.
I am not against memes, but meme coins are getting "a little" weird now.
Let's build real applications using blockchain.
— CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz_binance)
7:10 AM • Nov 26, 2024
But without real action, such sentiments are nothing more than an attempt to absolve them from the blame. Otherwise, we’d have seen fewer memecoin listings and more of the thousands of amazing utility projects being listed on these platforms.
The Bigger Picture: A Lesson for Web3🌐
Decentralization is often hailed as a cornerstone of innovation, allowing users to bypass traditional gatekeepers and interact freely in financial markets or online spaces. Platforms like Pump.fun embody this promise.
Yet, recent controversies highlight the risks of decentralization. The Pump.fun debacle serves as a cautionary tale for web3 innovation. Without ethical oversight, it risks spiraling into chaos. As the crypto space matures, platforms must balance creativity with responsibility, ensuring their tools don’t inadvertently reward harm.
Memecoins and gamified platforms like Pump.fun have the potential to shape culture and communities. But with that power comes the obligation to safeguard users and uphold the values that web3 seeks to promote: trust, transparency, and inclusivity.
Since the writing of this article Pump.fun has released a community notice following recent events
A Community Notice regarding recent events: pump.fun/docs/moderatio…
— pump.fun (@pumpdotfun)
8:01 PM • Nov 25, 2024
Reply